DAOnload is looking to create a community of developers, gamers and enthusiasts around the cryptocurrency. Their goal as a company is to help connect other professionals who are involved or want to be involved in blockchain technology with opportunities for collaboration and work.
The “group dynamics and team building pdf” is a document that was published by DAOnload. It talks about group dynamics, community building, and how to create an effective team in the cryptocurrency industry.
Along with leadership, community development and DAOs place a strong emphasis on group dynamics. In Breaking Patterns – Leadership in Web3, we mentioned Richard Bartlett’s Microsolidarity theory earlier this month. People form communities when they have a strong feeling of belonging, which may be equated to an attraction to a cause and a group of people dedicated to that cause.
A group is commonly defined as more than two individuals, however most groups begin with just one person. While many people are interested in learning about DAOs’ financial development, the methods of financial growth are determined by individual contributors and the community. Couldn’t we use what we’ve learned about group dynamics and growth structures to help us develop and maintain successful DAO projects?
Community Formation
Consider a basic illustration of how people form communities. During dinner, one individual with good communication skills gets an idea and shares it with a buddy. The notion strikes a chord with the buddy, and they begin to investigate it together. Later that week, the two buddies meet together again to talk about how the plan may come to fruition.
They draw out a strategy, but discover that a number of the items on the list are beyond their scope of knowledge. One of the pals knows someone who may be able to fill in the gaps. A few days later, the three-person group gets together with increasing vigor and eagerness to fine-tune the strategy.
While this example may seem simple, I’ve been a part of this same sequence of events hundreds of times. In reality, I’ve had the good fortune to play all three parts at different times. While a large percentage of these small seeds of potential never amounted to anything, it certainly informed my creative process with a profound effect. With all of this experience, I never considered the dynamics of groups as they move from the individual to the crowd.
Understanding a group’s superpowers and flaws will be very beneficial to DAO structure and governance as it grows and contracts. Let’s take a look at Bartlett’s viewpoint on Belonging in a Fractal World and how it could relate to DAOs.
Richard Bartlett is the photographer that created this image.
Belonging in a Fractal World
SELF – In a one-person group, you aren’t truly alone. Your experiences and identities make up who you are. Napoleon Hill’s Council of Invisible Advisors from his book Think and Grow Rich comes to mind often. He’d think about fresh ideas through the eyes of Henry Ford, Ben Franklin, and other individuals he respected based on what he’d read about their work. When I was younger, I battled tooth and nail to keep all of my ideas to myself, until I understood that there is a tragedy that befalls all brilliant ideas that aren’t given the opportunity to reach their full potential. New energy and new insights provide that possibility for these ideas.
PARTNERSHIP – As in the previous basic example, one person presents an idea to another, and a dance begins. Domination, which is a one-way dynamic seeking a single advantage, and partnership, which aims for a reciprocal dynamic and a mutually beneficial end, are typically at odds in the group of two. The latter is the product of successful relationships.
CREW – One of these fruitful collaborations may become a crew. Consider a crew to be the number of individuals who can have a coherent discourse over dinner. The group separates into numerous talks if it becomes too large. If they are the proper individuals, we don’t need massive bureaucratic processes to keep them engaged. Crews may be incredibly productive when it comes to completing tasks. The MODA Foundation, which is the centralized administration part of MODA DAO, is an example of a crew.
CONGREGATION — From the standpoint of a DAO, here is where we’d see a more formal governance structure emerge. When the group size is more than 15 but less than 150, members know a bit about most of the other members, but maintaining a deep level of connection becomes more challenging. The intricacy of these processes is shown via relationship math. A group of three has just six connections, but a group of 100 has over 5,000. This group structure should ideally enable the establishment of crews where deeper ties may develop, as well as a few organized get-togethers for the greater community around their shared goal.
NETWORK — This group structure allows important members from different congregations to connect and exchange best practices. From the standpoint of a DAO, this might be inter-DAO communication for many DAOs running on the same platform or protocol. This is something I’ve seen with DAO formation sites like DAOHaus and SyndicateDAO, where they create communities of individual DAOs. In many situations, these networks align with the web3 community’s overall ethos.
First principles are usually useful in helping me grasp new prospects, particularly when they can be linked to historical instances and practical outcomes. DAOs are founded on the fundamentals of community development and group dynamics. We can build the underlying structures that can deliver on the promise of DAOs by getting acquainted with them.
The “factors affecting group dynamics pdf” is a document that discusses the factors that affect group dynamics. The paper also includes a table of contents and an introduction paragraph.
Related Tags
- group dynamics and team building ppt
- introduction to group dynamics pdf
- group dynamics pdf notes
- types of group dynamics pdf
- group dynamics: theory